And so, another working week will soon draw to a close. Not a moment too soon, yes? This is, you may recall, our treasured signal to daydream about weekend plans. Our agenda is fairly modest. We hope to catch up on our reading, spend time with our Pharmalot ancestor, and promenade with the official mascots. We also hope to hold another listening party, where the rotation will likely feature this, this, this, and this. And what about you? This is a grand time to enjoy the great outdoors. Beaches and lakes are beckoning. City streets want to be strolled. And woods are inviting the adventurous for long mysterious walks. Take your pick. Or you could simply hide indoors and binge-watch something on the telly. Well, whatever you do, have a grand time. But be safe. Enjoy, and see you soon. …
A U.S. court tossed a U.S. Chamber of Commerce lawsuit challenging the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program established through the Inflation Reduction Act, with a judge finding that several plaintiffs in the suit lacked standing, STAT reports. U.S. District Judge Michael Newman for the Southern District of Ohio found that the Chamber’s argument it could sue on behalf of its members through associational standing was incorrect. The plaintiffs argued they could sue on behalf of pharmaceutical companies that are members of the organization — in this case, AbbVie and its subsidiary Pharmacyclics. Pharmacyclics is based in California, and AbbVie operates in Illinois, California, Massachusetts, and Washington, D.C., but the suit was filed with a local Chamber chapter in Dayton, Ohio.
California lawmakers are making a last-minute push before adjourning to restrain pharmacy benefit managers against the background of a national effort to rein in prescription drug prices, Bloomberg Law writes. Proponents of the bill, led by pharmacists, argue SB 966 would help place needed safeguards on the middlemen who negotiate with drug manufacturers and manage prescription benefits for employers. The bill would require PBMs to be licensed. Supporters say the companies have undermined competition and are financially squeezing smaller pharmacies. The effort comes as lawmakers in 41 states have filed more than 170 related bills this year to regulate PBMs.
This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers
Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and networking platform access.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
About the Author Reprints
To submit a correction request, please visit our Contact Us page.
STAT encourages you to share your voice. We welcome your commentary, criticism, and expertise on our subscriber-only platform, STAT+ Connect